![]()
Your Case |
|
Insurance Legislation Updates
|
|
![]() This legislation is part of a number of new Oregon laws which expand automobile insurance coverage for consumers, and clarify ambiguities in the insurance laws. |
This insurance loophole was solely because the injured persons were related to the at-fault driver. Oregon courts reformed such contracts and interpreted the policies as providing the statutorily required minimum limits of $25,000 in insurance coverage per person ($50,000 per collision). Under prior law, if a family member had horrendous injuries and losses that would be fairly valued, for example, at a million dollars, because of the family exclusion clause they could recover no more than $25,000. Under House Bill 3086, insurance companies may no longer exclude liability coverage for family members for policies issued or renewed after May 2007. Family members should now have access to the same amount of liability coverage as strangers do.
( www.leg.state.or.us/07reg/measpdf/hb3000.dir/hb3086.en.pdf )
Ordinarily, a person can get financial protection from being severely injured by an underinsured driver by purchasing a policy with significant underinsured motorist limits. However, under the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), there is an arbitrary low limit to the amount an injured person can recover against public entities, regardless of the severity of the losses. Unfortunately, Oregon courts held that a person could not recover under their own policy's UIM coverage any amount above the OTCA limits, because the OTCA set the maximum amount that the person was entitled to recover. So if a person had $300,000 in damages and a $300,000 underinsured motorist policy, when they were hit by a government vehicle, they could usually recover only $100,000 from the government agency, and nothing under their own UIM coverage that they had paid for. Under HB 2908 , a person is now entitled to recover the same amount of damages under their underinsured motorist insurance coverage, regardless of whether the injury was caused by a government employee or a private citizen.
( www.leg.state.or.us/07reg/measpdf/hb2900.dir/hb2908.en.pdf )
Teen Drivers and Parents' Liability
Get the Lead Out Test Kits
When Government Does Wrong
Nursing Home and Assisted Living Rights
Health Insurance Tort Blues
Uninsured Motorist Update
Holiday Accidents
Premises Liability
Inadequate Liability Insurance
Measure Seeks to Limit Contingent Fees
Dealing with Clients Outside Your Scope of Practice
The
Corson & Johnson Law Firm serves clients throughout Oregon, including
Eugene, Portland, Brownsville, Springfield, Hood River, Brookings, Corvallis,
Salem, Redmond, Roseburg, Medford, Klamath Falls, Myrtle Creek, Bend,
Albany, Creswell, Ashland, Central Point, Grants Pass, Junction City,
Florence, Tigard, Cottage Grove, Coos Bay, North Bend, Newport, Oregon
City, Hillsboro, Gresham, Beaverton.
Benton County • Clackamas
County • Coos County • Crook County • Deschutes County • Douglas
County • Jackson County • Jefferson County • Josephine County • Klamath
County • Lane County • Lincoln County • Linn County • Marion
County • Multnomah County • Polk County • Tillamook County • Washington
County
The
Corson & Johnson Law Firm does not offer any guarantee of case results.
Past success in litigation does not guarantee success in any new or future
civil action. Our web site describes some of the cases that Don Corson, Lara
Johnson, or The Corson & Johnson Law Firm has worked on in the past. Our
description of those cases is summary in nature. The results obtained in
each of the cases depended on the particular facts of each case. The results
of other cases will differ based on the different facts involved.
FULL
DISCLAIMER